Athanasiou v. Roftsias
167 A. 265, 86 N.H. 595, 1933 N.H. LEXIS 89
Opinion
If the excluded evidence was relevant, it was within the trial court’s discretion to exclude it for remoteness. As the exclusion may have been for this reason, the exception, being general, presents no legal question. Boulanger v. McQuesten, 79 N. H. 175, 176.
The case shows evidence warranting the argument excepted to.
Judgments on the verdicts.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Athanasiou v. Roftsias, 167 A. 265, 86 N.H. 595, 1933 N.H. LEXIS 89 (N.H. 1933).
167 A. 265 (Athanasiou v. Roftsias) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Boulanger v. McQuesten
106 A. 492 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1919)