Athan v. National Savings & Trust Co.

D.C. Circuit

Athan v. National Savings & Trust Co.

275 F. 1020, 51 App. D.C. 401, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 2310

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedJune 6, 1921

DocketNo. 3434

StatusPublished

This text of 275 F. 1020 (Athan v. National Savings & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Athan v. National Savings & Trust Co., 275 F. 1020, 51 App. D.C. 401, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 2310 (D.C. Cir. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

This is a landlord and tenant proceeding, in which the landlord, National Savings & Trust Company, applied to the rent commission to recover possession of the premises in question. The commission found for the landlord. It then proceeded in the municipal court and secured judgment for possession on the findings of the rent commission. On appeal, the Supreme Court sustained the municipal court. From the judgment this appeal was taken. On the above statement, the case is ruled by Killgore v. Zinkhan, - App. D. C. -, 274 Fed. 140, this day decided. The judgment is affirmed, with costs. Affirmed.

Mr. Justice STAFFORD, of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, sat’in the place of Mr. Justice ROBB.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

This is a landlord and tenant proceeding, in which the landlord, National Savings & Trust Company, applied to the rent commission to recover possession of the premises in question. The commission found for the landlord. It then proceeded in the municipal court and secured judgment for possession on the findings of the rent commission. On appeal, the Supreme Court sustained the municipal court. From the judgment this appeal was taken. On the above statement, the case is ruled by Killgore v. Zinkhan, - App. D. C. -, 274 Fed. 140, this day decided. The judgment is affirmed, with costs. Affirmed.

Mr. Justice STAFFORD, of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, sat’in the place of Mr. Justice ROBB.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 F. 1020, 51 App. D.C. 401, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 2310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/athan-v-national-savings-trust-co-cadc-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack