Ater v. State

432 S.W.3d 805, 2014 WL 2518691, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 611
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 3, 2014·No. No. ED 100112·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David A. Ater (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Judgment on Movant’s Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence denying Movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ater v. State, 432 S.W.3d 805, 2014 WL 2518691, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 611 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

432 S.W.3d 805 (Ater v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.