Atencio v. Pena

Opinion

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

3 and MELISSA ATENCIO,

4 Plaintiffs-Appellees,

5 v. NO. 32,784

6 DEBBIE PENA and

8 Defendants-Appellants.

10 Sheri Raphaelson, District Judge

11 Andrew Atencio 12 Jeffrey Atencio 13 Melissa Atencio 14 Santa Cruz, NM

15 Pro se Appellees

16 Amy L. Propps 17 Santa Fe, NM

18 for Appellants

2 GARCIA, Judge.

3 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reason stated in the notice of

4 proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed,

5 and the time for doing so has expired.

6 Affirmed.

8 9 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge

10 WE CONCUR:

11 12 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge

13 14 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge