Atchison v. Parks

9 Rob. 141
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedOctober 15, 1844
StatusPublished

This text of 9 Rob. 141 (Atchison v. Parks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Atchison v. Parks, 9 Rob. 141 (La. 1844).

Opinion

Simon, J.

This case is exactly similar to that just decided of Hall and others v. Parks and another. The injunction was obtain[142]*142ed on the same grounds, and the same judgment was rendered by the inferior court. Being governed by the same rules, the injunction must be perpetuated in the same manner. .

Stacy and Sparrow for the appellants. Selby, for the defendants.

It is, therefore, ordered and decreed, that the judgment of the District Court be annulled and reversed ; and that the injunction sued out in this case be perpetuated, as against the defendants in their capacity of tutor and tutrix; the costs in both courts to be borne by said defendants and appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 Rob. 141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atchison-v-parks-la-1844.