Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Collins

72 P. 1097, 67 Kan. 821, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 341
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedMay 9, 1903
DocketNo. 13,102
StatusPublished

This text of 72 P. 1097 (Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Collins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Collins, 72 P. 1097, 67 Kan. 821, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 341 (kan 1903).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The brief of counsel for plaintiff in error is devoted chiefly to a discussion of the facts. We have reviewed the testimony and find it ample to sustain the judgment. If the exclusion of the rules of the company was error, we cannot review the action of the trial court for the reason that the excluded rules are not incorporated in the record.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 P. 1097, 67 Kan. 821, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atchison-topeka-santa-fe-railway-co-v-collins-kan-1903.