Atcheson v. Broadhead's Adm'r
This text of 56 Ala. 414 (Atcheson v. Broadhead's Adm'r) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In Childress v. Monette, at a former term (54 Ala. 317), this conrt held, that the purchaser of a mortgagor’s equity of redemption in land, after the maturity of the mortgage, did not obtain such a title as would enable him to maintain a possessory action in the nature of ejectment, in a common-law court, to obtain possession. . Under the influence of that decision, the judgment of the Circuit Court must be reversed, and the cause be remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 Ala. 414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atcheson-v-broadheads-admr-ala-1876.