Atcheson v. Broadhead's Adm'r
56 Ala. 414
Opinion
In Childress v. Monette, at a former term (54 Ala. 317), this conrt held, that the purchaser of a mortgagor’s equity of redemption in land, after the maturity of the mortgage, did not obtain such a title as would enable him to maintain a possessory action in the nature of ejectment, in a common-law court, to obtain possession. . Under the influence of that decision, the judgment of the Circuit Court must be reversed, and the cause be remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Atcheson v. Broadhead's Adm'r, 56 Ala. 414 (Ala. 1876).
56 Ala. 414 (Atcheson v. Broadhead's Adm'r) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cotton v. Carlisle
85 Ala. 175 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1887)
Marks v. Robinson & Ledyard
82 Ala. 69 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1886)
Kelly v. Longshore
78 Ala. 203 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1884)
Allen v. Kellam
69 Ala. 442 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1881)