Atayde v. Wormuth
This text of Atayde v. Wormuth (Atayde v. Wormuth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Mexico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO JESSICA ATAYDE and JOHNNY PIPPEN, Plaintiffs, v. CR No. 21-1131 KG/DLM CHRISTINE WORMUTH, Secretary of the Army, Department of the Army, Defendant. ORDER OF REFERENCE In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. $$ 636(b)(1)(B), (b)(3), and Va. Beach Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Wood, 901 F.2d 849 (10 Cir. 1990), this matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Damian L. Martinez to conduct hearings, if warranted, including evidentiary hearings, and to perform any legal analysis required to recommend to the Court an ultimate disposition of Defendant’s Motion to Set a Briefing Schedule for Dispositive Motions and to Postpone Trial (Doc. 76). The Magistrate Judge will submit an analysis, including findings of fact, if necessary, and recommended disposition, to the District Judge assigned to the case, with copies provided to the parties. The parties will be given the opportunity to object to the proposed findings, analysis, and disposition as described in 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Objections must be filed within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the proposed disposition. tele UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Atayde v. Wormuth, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atayde-v-wormuth-nmd-2024.