Atanya Bernard v. Citimortgage, Inc.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-12-00308-CV
ATANYA BERNARD APPELLANT
V.
CITIMORTGAGE, INC. APPELLEE
------------
FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------
On March 8, 2013, we notified appellant for the third time that her brief had
not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See
Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the
appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.
Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for
want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.
DELIVERED: April 25, 2013
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Atanya Bernard v. Citimortgage, Inc. (Atanya Bernard v. Citimortgage, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.