Atan v. Fitzgerald

57 A.D.3d 594, 868 N.Y.2d 546

This text of 57 A.D.3d 594 (Atan v. Fitzgerald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Atan v. Fitzgerald, 57 A.D.3d 594, 868 N.Y.2d 546 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

The defendants failed to establish their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint was properly denied (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). Skelos, J.E, Ritter, Dillon, Garni and Leventhal, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alvarez v. Prospect Hospital
501 N.E.2d 572 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 A.D.3d 594, 868 N.Y.2d 546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atan-v-fitzgerald-nyappdiv-2008.