Atalig v. Wells

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-10855 Summary Calendar

__________________

DAVID Q. ATALIG,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

J. WELLS; ROBERTS, Lt.; MURPHY, Lt.; RUDY CHILDRESS; JUAN SOTO; ALLEN BOOTH; HAROLD KILLYON; CHARLES TURNBO; JOHN L. MEGATHLIN,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:95-CV-278-Y

- - - - - - - - - -

January 4, 1996

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

David Q. Atalig appeals the dismissal, with prejudice, for

frivolousness of his Bivens** complaint. We have reviewed

Atalig's arguments and the record. We conclude that no

reversible error occurred. For essentially the same reasons as

explained in the district court's order of dismissal, see Atalig

v. Wells, No. 4:95-CV-278-Y (N.D. Tex. Aug. 31, 1995), we

AFFIRM.

*

Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

**

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

No. 95-10855