Atalanta Trading Corp. v. United States

32 Cust. Ct. 19, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1677
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJanuary 7, 1954
DocketC. D. 1574
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 32 Cust. Ct. 19 (Atalanta Trading Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Atalanta Trading Corp. v. United States, 32 Cust. Ct. 19, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1677 (cusc 1954).

Opinion

JohnsoN, Judge:

This is a protest against the collector’s assessment of duty on frozen frog legs imported from Cuba at 8 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1558 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the exclusive trade agreement with Cuba, T. D. 51819. Various claims were made in the protest but those relied upon by the plaintiff are (1) that the merchandise is dutiable at lK cents per pound as fish under paragraph 717 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802, by virtue of the similitude clause of paragraph 1559, or (2) at 3 cents per pound as game under paragraph 704, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802, either directly or by similitude.

The pertinent provisions of the tariff act and of the trade agreements are as follows:

Tariff Act of 1930:
Par. 1558. That there shall be levied, collected, and paid on the importation of all raw or unmanufactured articles not enumerated or provided for, a duty of [21]*2110 per centum ad valorem, and on all articles manufactured, in whole or in part, not specially provided for, a duty of 20 per centum ad valorem.
Par. 1559. That each and every imported article, not enumerated in this Act, which is similar, either in material, quality, texture, or the use to which it may be applied to any article enumerated in this Act as chargeable with duty, shall be subject to the same rate of duty which is levied on the enumerated article which it most resembles in any of the particulars before mentioned; * * *.

Exclusive trade agreement with Cuba, T. D. 51819:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Keer v. United States
58 Cust. Ct. 301 (U.S. Customs Court, 1967)
Atalanta Trading Corp. v. United States
37 Cust. Ct. 149 (U.S. Customs Court, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 Cust. Ct. 19, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atalanta-trading-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1954.