Atain Specialty Insurance Company v. Marquez
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 ATAIN SPECIALTY INSURANCE Case No. 1:19-cv-01672-DAD-SAB COMPANY, 10 ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT Plaintiff, TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE 11 DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY v. DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41 (a) 12 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL LORENZO MARQUEZ, PROCEDURE 13 Defendant. (ECF No. 75) 14 15 16 On May 4, 2021, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice and with 17 | each party to bear its own costs and fees. In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has 18 | been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 19 | (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs or 29 | attorneys’ fees. 21 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this 22 | case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule (a). 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 FA. 45 | Dated: _May 5, 2021 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Atain Specialty Insurance Company v. Marquez (Atain Specialty Insurance Company v. Marquez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.