Ataeva, LLC v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

• Court: District Court, C.D. California
• Decided: May 9, 2024
• Docket: 8:24-cv-00840
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL

Case No. 8:24-cv-00840-JVS(KESx) Date May 9, 2024 Title Ataeva, LLC v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

Present: The Honorable JAMES V. SELNA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Elsa Vargas Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None Present None Present Proceedings: (INCHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION On April 18, 2024, the Clerk of Court filed a Notice to Counsel Re: Copyright, Patent, and Reporting Requirements, directing Plaintiff to file the appropriate AO-120 and/or AO-121 with the Clerk within 10 days. (Dkt. 9.) The record reflects counsel has not filed the required at this time. (See generally Dkt.) Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in on or before May 17, 2024 why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff may discharge this order by filing the forms required by the Central District of California’s Local Rule 3-1. Failure to comply with the court’s order may result in dismissal. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 629 (1962) (“The authority of a federal trial court to dismiss a plaintiffs action with prejudice because of his failure to prosecute cannot seriously be doubted.”); Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 693, 689 (9th Cir. 2005) (“[C]Jourts may dismiss under Rule 41(b) sua sponte, at least under certain circumstances.”); Ash v. Cvetkov, 739 F.2d 493, 496 (9th Cir. 1984) (“It is within the inherent power of the court to sua sponte a case for lack of prosecution.”).

Initial of Deputy Clerk eva