Astwood v. Wanamaker
58 A. 139, 209 Pa. 103, 1904 Pa. LEXIS 565
Opinion
A majority of the court are of the opinion that this case falls within the rule of construction of the Act of May 5,1899, P. L. 248, adopted in Prentice v. Hancock, 204 Pa. 128, and as the money item of the judgment is less than $1,500 the appeal must go to the Superior Court. We therefore express no opinion on any of the questions raised.
Record ordered to be remitted to the Superior Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Astwood v. Wanamaker, 58 A. 139, 209 Pa. 103, 1904 Pa. LEXIS 565 (Pa. 1904).
58 A. 139 (Astwood v. Wanamaker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sharp v. Keiser
140 A. 772 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1928)
McGlinn's Estate
113 A. 548 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1921)
Green v. Duffee
80 A. 886 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1911)
Hartman v. Reading Wood Pulley Co.
38 Pa. Super. 587 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1909)
Spring City Brick Co. v. Henry Martin Brick Machine Manufacturing Co.
70 A. 774 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1908)
May's Estate
67 A. 120 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1907)