Astrop v. Eckerd Corp.

Fourth Circuit

Astrop v. Eckerd Corp.

397 F. App'x 881

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 14, 2010·No. No. 10-1611·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Henry Lewis Astrop appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Astrop v. Eckerd Corp., No. 3:09-cv-00681-RLW, 2010 WL 1779992 (E.D.Va. Apr. 29 & 30, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in [882]*882the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Henry Lewis Astrop appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Astrop v. Eckerd Corp., No. 3:09-cv-00681-RLW, 2010 WL 1779992 (E.D.Va. Apr. 29 & 30, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in [882]*882the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Astrop v. Eckerd Corp., 397 F. App'x 881 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

397 F. App'x 881 (Astrop v. Eckerd Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related