Astrop v. Eckerd Corp.

397 F. App'x 881
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 14, 2010
DocketNo. 10-1611
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 397 F. App'x 881 (Astrop v. Eckerd Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Astrop v. Eckerd Corp., 397 F. App'x 881 (4th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Henry Lewis Astrop appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Astrop v. Eckerd Corp., No. 3:09-cv-00681-RLW, 2010 WL 1779992 (E.D.Va. Apr. 29 & 30, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in [882]*882the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Astrop v. Eckerd Corp.
178 L. Ed. 2d 779 (Supreme Court, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
397 F. App'x 881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/astrop-v-eckerd-corp-ca4-2010.