Astromovich v. Huntington School District No. 3
436 N.E.2d 192, 56 N.Y.2d 634, 450 N.Y.S.2d 786, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3300
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (80 AD2d 628).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Astromovich v. Huntington School District No. 3, 436 N.E.2d 192, 56 N.Y.2d 634, 450 N.Y.S.2d 786, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3300 (N.Y. 1982).
436 N.E.2d 192 (Astromovich v. Huntington School District No. 3) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cinqumani v. County of Nassau
28 A.D.3d 699 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Mignott v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.
250 A.D.2d 165 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Cruz v. City of New York
232 A.D.2d 446 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Mercer v. City of Mount Vernon
224 A.D.2d 402 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Rose v. Metro North Commuter Railroad
143 A.D.2d 993 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)