Astrid Perdomo v. Santiago J. Teran

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 18, 2025
Docket3D2024-2077
StatusPublished

This text of Astrid Perdomo v. Santiago J. Teran (Astrid Perdomo v. Santiago J. Teran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Astrid Perdomo v. Santiago J. Teran, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed June 18, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D24-2077 Lower Tribunal No. 15-1006-SP-05 ________________

Astrid Perdomo, Appellant,

vs.

Santiago J. Teran, Appellee.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the County Court for Miami- Dade County, Luis Perez-Medina, Judge.

Astrid Perdomo, in proper person.

Santiago J. Teran, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and GORDO and GOODEN, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Villamorey, S.A. v. BDT Invs., Inc., 245 So. 3d 909, 912

(Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (“[T]he person, by affirmatively seeking to dissolve the

writ, has assented to the court’s jurisdiction over it and is a party to the

garnishment proceedings.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Villamorey, S.A. v. Bdt Investments, Inc.
245 So. 3d 909 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Astrid Perdomo v. Santiago J. Teran, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/astrid-perdomo-v-santiago-j-teran-fladistctapp-2025.