Astrella v. Schrader

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Astrella v. Schrader

200 Misc. 245, 106 N.Y.S.2d 925, 1951 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2259

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMay 24, 1951

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 200 Misc. 245 (Astrella v. Schrader) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Astrella v. Schrader, 200 Misc. 245, 106 N.Y.S.2d 925, 1951 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2259 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The refusal of the Trial Judge to take judicial notice of the police department rules and regulations and city ordinances pertaining to vehicular traffic and declination to instruct the jury with respect thereto, when requested, was error. The ground of refusal and declination to charge was that formal proof of rules and regulations and of the city ordinances was not made. No such proof was required (L. 1917, ch. 382; Administrative Code of City of New York, § 982-8.0, subd. [a]).

The judgment should be reversed and new trial ordered, with íh30 costs to appellant to abide the event.

Hofstadter, Eder and Schreiber, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI