Astrella v. Schrader

200 Misc. 245, 106 N.Y.S.2d 925, 1951 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2259
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided May 24, 1951·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The refusal of the Trial Judge to take judicial notice of the police department rules and regulations and city ordinances pertaining to vehicular traffic and declination to instruct the jury with respect thereto, when requested, was error. The ground of refusal and declination to charge was that formal proof of rules and regulations and of the city ordinances was not made. No such proof was required (L. 1917, ch. 382; Administrative Code of City of New York, § 982-8.0, subd. [a]).

The judgment should be reversed and new trial ordered, with íh30 costs to appellant to abide the event.

Hofstadter, Eder and Schreiber, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Astrella v. Schrader, 200 Misc. 245, 106 N.Y.S.2d 925, 1951 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2259 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

200 Misc. 245 (Astrella v. Schrader) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Patterson
169 Misc. 2d 787 (New York Supreme Court, 1996)