Astrab v. O'Connell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Astrab v. O'Connell

274 A.D. 997, 84 N.Y.S.2d 533, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4428

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 6, 1948·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

This is a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination of respondents, as members of the State Liquor Authority, revoking petitioner’s restaurant liquor license. We hold there was ample credible evidence to justify a finding that petitioner violated subdivision 3-b of section 102 and subdivision 12 of section 106 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law. For that reason the determination is unanimously confirmed and the proceeding dismissed, without costs. Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, ’ Sneed and Wenzel, JJ. [See 275 App. Div. 668.] ’

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination of respondents, as members of the State Liquor Authority, revoking petitioner’s restaurant liquor license. We hold there was ample credible evidence to justify a finding that petitioner violated subdivision 3-b of section 102 and subdivision 12 of section 106 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law. For that reason the determination is unanimously confirmed and the proceeding dismissed, without costs. Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, ’ Sneed and Wenzel, JJ. [See 275 App. Div. 668.] ’

Astrab v. O'Connell, 274 A.D. 997, 84 N.Y.S.2d 533, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4428 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

Pincite

274 A.D. 997 (Astrab v. O'Connell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related