Astra Trading Corp. v. United States

58 Cust. Ct. 885, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1877

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Astra Trading Corp. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 56 Cust. Ct. 555 →

United States Customs Court·Decided May 1, 1967·No. No. P67/131; protests 66/8748, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise classified as flashlights is,similar in all material respects to those the subject of Astra Trading Corp. v. United States (56 Cust. Ct. 555, C.D. 2703), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

(Note: The following protests were decided by a special second division consisting of Bao, Ford, and Bichardson, Judges.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Astra Trading Corp. v. United States, 58 Cust. Ct. 885, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1877 (cusc 1967).

Pincite

58 Cust. Ct. 885 (Astra Trading Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Astra Trading Corp. v. United States

56 Cust. Ct. 555 (U.S. Customs Court, 1966)

Opinion

Related