Astra Trading Corp. v. United States

40 Cust. Ct. 631
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Astra Trading Corp. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 37 Cust. Ct. 433
United States Customs Court·Decided March 25, 1958·No. V. D. 70; Entry No. 837898·Published

Opinion

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This matter is before me on remand from classification proceedings decided by the first division of this court in Astra Trading Corp. v. United States, 39 Cust. Ct. 390, Abstract 61108. The conclusion therein, and the judgment issued pursuant thereto, was to the effect that the protest had been' prematurely filed and the matter was remanded to a single judge in reappraisement to determine the proper dutiable values in the manner provided by law. (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d).)

A stipulation of submission, upon which the matter is now before me, establishes that the proper basis for appraisement of the articles in question is export value, as defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such statutory value for each class of merchandise is as follows:

United States dollars per
Merchandise each
300 pcs. 7 x 50
Binoculars_ $11. 65
Carrying cases_ 1. 25
Net packed

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Astra Trading Corp. v. United States, 40 Cust. Ct. 631 (cusc 1958).

40 Cust. Ct. 631 (Astra Trading Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astra Trading Corp. v. United States
39 Cust. Ct. 390 (U.S. Customs Court, 1957)