Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Astoria Veneer Mills and Dock Co. v. Marden Orth & Hastings Co.

Astoria Veneer Mills and Dock Co. v. Marden Orth & Hastings Co.

206 A.D. 776
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1923
DocketAppeal No. 1
StatusPublished

This text of 206 A.D. 776 (Astoria Veneer Mills and Dock Co. v. Marden Orth & Hastings Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Astoria Veneer Mills and Dock Co. v. Marden Orth & Hastings Co., 206 A.D. 776 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Without determining the question of the validity of the contract, we are satisfied with the referee’s conclusion that plaintiff prior to July 31, 1916, did not enter into binding obligations in Mexico for the purchase of logwood for delivery after said date. Present — Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
206 A.D. 776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/astoria-veneer-mills-and-dock-co-v-marden-orth-hastings-co-nyappdiv-1923.