Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Kaufman

158 So. 3d 675, 2015 WL 24109
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 2, 2015
DocketNo. 5D13-3085
StatusPublished

This text of 158 So. 3d 675 (Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Kaufman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Kaufman, 158 So. 3d 675, 2015 WL 24109 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Astoria Federal Savings and Loan Association appeals the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of Danielle Kaufman in this mortgage foreclosure case. The basis for the summary judgment was the trial court’s determination that Astoria did. not comply with the notice of default requirement of paragraph 22 of the mortgage, which required that Astoria give Kaufman notice of the default and inform her of the steps she could take to cure the default. Astoria argues that the summary judgment should be reversed because the record reflects that it did send notice in compliance with paragraph 22 of the mortgage. Our review of the record reveals that Astoria is correct and that the notice that it provided to Kaufman was in compliance with paragraph 22. Therefore, we reverse the summary judgment under review and remand to the trial court for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

SAWAYA, WALLIS, JJ„ and O’KANE, J.H., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 So. 3d 675, 2015 WL 24109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/astoria-federal-savings-loan-assn-v-kaufman-fladistctapp-2015.