Aston v. Dodson
49 So. 856, 161 Ala. 518, 1909 Ala. LEXIS 165
Opinion
This appeal was taken from a decree of the chancellor sustaining demurrers to 1be re[519] spondenfis cross-bill' and dismissing same. The decree in question is not such a one as will support an appeal under section 2838 of the Code of 1907. Nor is it such a final decree as to bring it within the influence of section 2837 of the Code.
The appeal must be dismissed, under the case of Thorne-Franklin Co. v. Gunn, 123 Ala. 640, 26 South. 198, and cases there cited.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Aston v. Dodson, 49 So. 856, 161 Ala. 518, 1909 Ala. LEXIS 165 (Ala. 1909).
49 So. 856 (Aston v. Dodson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nearhos v. City of Mobile
57 So. 2d 819 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1952)
Herren v. Beck
164 So. 904 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1935)
Faylor v. Koontz
115 N.E. 95 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1917)
Bennett v. Hall
69 So. 136 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1914)