Aston v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Aston v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad

12 A.D.2d 934, 212 N.Y.S.2d 724, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12851

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 6, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.2d 934 (Aston v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aston v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad, 12 A.D.2d 934, 212 N.Y.S.2d 724, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12851 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated September 29, 1960, as grants plaintiff’s motion to strike out the defendant’s answer unless it submits to an examination before trial, and as denies defendant’s cross motion for discovery of plaintiff’s medical and roentgenologist reports. Order insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Defendant’s time to submit to the examination in order to avoid the striking out of its answer, extended until 30 days after entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated September 29, 1960, as grants plaintiff’s motion to strike out the defendant’s answer unless it submits to an examination before trial, and as denies defendant’s cross motion for discovery of plaintiff’s medical and roentgenologist reports. Order insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Defendant’s time to submit to the examination in order to avoid the striking out of its answer, extended until 30 days after entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 934, 212 N.Y.S.2d 724, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aston-v-chicago-milwaukee-st-paul-pacific-railroad-nyappdiv-1961.