Aston v. Barnett

5 Ky. 318
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided July 1, 1811·Published

Opinion

ASTON exhibited his bill, to be relieved against a judgment at law obtained by Barnett. He states that he borrowed a horse of Barnett, for Burks ; that he joined Murks in the note for the horse to Barnett ; that he was only security for Burks, and Barnett was to look to Burks alone ; that Burks let him (Aston) have thej horse for one Burks had before that time got of Ami m : that he, Aston, bet the horse on a race ; and that Barnett well knew Aston was only the security of Burks, and also that the object in view in procuring the ftorsi was to bet him on the race.

[319]*319The bill was demurred to ; a rule was given for join-der in demurrer ; and for want ef joinder, the bill was dismissed.

By the Court.

-The statements in the bill present no ground for defence at law, nor for relief in equity.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aston v. Barnett, 5 Ky. 318 (Ky. Ct. App. 1811).

5 Ky. 318 (Aston v. Barnett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.