Astillero v. Abramov

92 A.D.3d 436, 937 N.Y.2d 593
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 2, 2012
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 92 A.D.3d 436 (Astillero v. Abramov) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Astillero v. Abramov, 92 A.D.3d 436, 937 N.Y.2d 593 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Plaintiff initially chose an improper venue in New York County. However, plaintiff selected this venue based on Department of Motor Vehicle records, which indicated that defendant Asia Abramov resided in New York County. Defendant Abramov had recently moved to Queens County, but failed to notify the Department of Motor Vehicle as required by Vehicle and Traffic Law § 505 (5). Under these circumstances, plaintiff did not forfeit her right to choose a venue by her initial choice of a venue that turned out to be improper (see Vasquez v Sonin, 259 AD2d 340, 341 [1999]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P, Friedman, Catterson, Renwick and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Leszyk v. Guthrie Corning Hosp.
2025 NY Slip Op 31486(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2025)
Hakanjin v. Lincare, Inc.
2019 NY Slip Op 3677 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 A.D.3d 436, 937 N.Y.2d 593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/astillero-v-abramov-nyappdiv-2012.