Astillero Regnicoli, S.A.I.C.A. v. North

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Astillero Regnicoli, S.A.I.C.A. v. North

677 So. 2d 26, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6785, 1996 WL 347027

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 26, 1996

DocketNo. 95-4265

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 677 So. 2d 26 (Astillero Regnicoli, S.A.I.C.A. v. North) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Astillero Regnicoli, S.A.I.C.A. v. North, 677 So. 2d 26, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6785, 1996 WL 347027 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, a boat manufacturer in Argentina, appeals an order denying its motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Because the relevant facts in the affidavits and [27]*27depositions were in conflict, the trial court erred in concluding that appellant was amenable to long-arm service without conducting an evidentiary hearing. Blue Cross & Blue Shield v. Nat’l Alcoholism Programs/Cooper City, Fla., Inc., 648 So.2d 231 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). We therefore reverse and remand for the trial court to resolve the factual disputes, and determine first, whether the jurisdictional facts fit within section 48.193(l)(f)(2), Florida Statutes (1993), and, if so, whether there are “minimum contacts” which satisfy due process. Unger v. Publisher Entry Serv. Inc., 513 So.2d 674 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987), rev. denied, 520 So.2d 586 (Fla.1988) quoted with approval in Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais, 554 So.2d 499 (Fla.1989).

WARNER, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, a boat manufacturer in Argentina, appeals an order denying its motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Because the relevant facts in the affidavits and [27]*27depositions were in conflict, the trial court erred in concluding that appellant was amenable to long-arm service without conducting an evidentiary hearing. Blue Cross & Blue Shield v. Nat’l Alcoholism Programs/Cooper City, Fla., Inc., 648 So.2d 231 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). We therefore reverse and remand for the trial court to resolve the factual disputes, and determine first, whether the jurisdictional facts fit within section 48.193(l)(f)(2), Florida Statutes (1993), and, if so, whether there are “minimum contacts” which satisfy due process. Unger v. Publisher Entry Serv. Inc., 513 So.2d 674 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987), rev. denied, 520 So.2d 586 (Fla.1988) quoted with approval in Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais, 554 So.2d 499 (Fla.1989).

WARNER, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

677 So. 2d 26, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6785, 1996 WL 347027, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/astillero-regnicoli-saica-v-north-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack