Astete-Diaz v. Sessions
This text of 698 F. App'x 548 (Astete-Diaz v. Sessions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Manuel Antonio Astete-Diaz, a native and citizen of Chile, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision granting voluntary departure. We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to consider Astete-Diaz’s challenges to the BIA’s April 2012 order denying his due process claims re[549]*549garding a continuance and asylum relief, where this petition for review is not timely as to that order. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1) (“The petition for review must be filed not later than 30 days after the date of the final order of removal.”); Rizo v. Lynch, 810 F.3d 688, 691 (9th Cir. 2016) (a BIA order remanding solely for voluntary departure proceedings is a final order of removal).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
698 F. App'x 548, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/astete-diaz-v-sessions-ca9-2017.