Astacio v. Bayley Seton Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Astacio v. Bayley Seton Hospital

291 A.D.2d 272, 737 N.Y.S.2d 285, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1587

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 14, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 291 A.D.2d 272 (Astacio v. Bayley Seton Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Astacio v. Bayley Seton Hospital, 291 A.D.2d 272, 737 N.Y.S.2d 285, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1587 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Jerry Crispino, J.), entered February 16, 2001, which granted third-party defendant’s motion for reargument only to the extent of directing plaintiffs to provide the board certifications, if any, of their expert witness, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The order was a provident exercise of discretion, granting movant all that he sought and all that he was entitled to on the merits based upon reargument papers containing only the barest mention of the issue advanced unsuccessfully on the prior motion. We have considered third-party defendant’s other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Andrias, Rubin and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Jerry Crispino, J.), entered February 16, 2001, which granted third-party defendant’s motion for reargument only to the extent of directing plaintiffs to provide the board certifications, if any, of their expert witness, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The order was a provident exercise of discretion, granting movant all that he sought and all that he was entitled to on the merits based upon reargument papers containing only the barest mention of the issue advanced unsuccessfully on the prior motion. We have considered third-party defendant’s other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Andrias, Rubin and Buckley, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

291 A.D.2d 272, 737 N.Y.S.2d 285, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/astacio-v-bayley-seton-hospital-nyappdiv-2002.