Association of Apartment Owners of Marine Surf Waikiki, Inc. v. Pikor

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Association of Apartment Owners of Marine Surf Waikiki, Inc. v. Pikor

CourtHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 9, 2021

DocketCAAP-20-0000764

StatusPublished

This text of Association of Apartment Owners of Marine Surf Waikiki, Inc. v. Pikor (Association of Apartment Owners of Marine Surf Waikiki, Inc. v. Pikor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Association of Apartment Owners of Marine Surf Waikiki, Inc. v. Pikor, (hawapp 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 09-JUN-2021 09:35 AM Dkt. 32 ODSD NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF MARINE SURF WAIKIKI, INC., a Hawai#i Nonprofit corporation, by its Board of Directors, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NIKODEM PIKOR, Defendant-Appellant

NIKODEM PIKOR, Counterclaimant-Appellant, v. ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF MARINE SURF WAIKIKI, INC., a Hawai#i Nonprofit corporation, by its Board of Directors, Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee

NIKODEM PIKOR, Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORPORATION, Foreign Profit Corporation, Third Party Defendant-Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT HONOLULU DIVISION (CIVIL CASE NO. 1RC191003776)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL (By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Fujise and Wadsworth, JJ.) Upon review of the record, it appears that: (1) On December 18, 2020, Defendant/Counterclaimant/ Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant Nikodem Pikor (Pikor) filed the notice of appeal; (2) The opening brief was due on a second extension on or before May 14, 2021; NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

(3) Pikor failed to file the opening brief or request another extension of time; (4) On May 21, 2021, the appellate clerk notified Pikor that the time for filing the opening brief had expired, the matter would be called to the court's attention on June 1, 2021, for appropriate action, which could include dismissal of the appeal, under Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 30, and Pikor could request relief from default by motion; and (5) Pikor took no further action in this appeal. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, June 9, 2021. /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza Chief Judge

/s/ Alexa D.M. Fujise Associate Judge

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 09-JUN-2021 09:35 AM Dkt. 32 ODSD NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF MARINE SURF WAIKIKI, INC., a Hawai#i Nonprofit corporation, by its Board of Directors, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NIKODEM PIKOR, Defendant-Appellant

NIKODEM PIKOR, Counterclaimant-Appellant, v. ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF MARINE SURF WAIKIKI, INC., a Hawai#i Nonprofit corporation, by its Board of Directors, Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee

NIKODEM PIKOR, Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORPORATION, Foreign Profit Corporation, Third Party Defendant-Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT HONOLULU DIVISION (CIVIL CASE NO. 1RC191003776)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL (By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Fujise and Wadsworth, JJ.) Upon review of the record, it appears that: (1) On December 18, 2020, Defendant/Counterclaimant/ Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant Nikodem Pikor (Pikor) filed the notice of appeal; (2) The opening brief was due on a second extension on or before May 14, 2021; NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

(3) Pikor failed to file the opening brief or request another extension of time; (4) On May 21, 2021, the appellate clerk notified Pikor that the time for filing the opening brief had expired, the matter would be called to the court's attention on June 1, 2021, for appropriate action, which could include dismissal of the appeal, under Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 30, and Pikor could request relief from default by motion; and (5) Pikor took no further action in this appeal. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, June 9, 2021. /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza Chief Judge

/s/ Alexa D.M. Fujise Associate Judge

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Association of Apartment Owners of Marine Surf Waikiki, Inc. v. Pikor, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/association-of-apartment-owners-of-marine-surf-waikiki-inc-v-pikor-hawapp-2021.