Association of Apartment Owners of Kulana v. Raymond

CourtHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 9, 2021
DocketCAAP-20-0000502
StatusPublished

This text of Association of Apartment Owners of Kulana v. Raymond (Association of Apartment Owners of Kulana v. Raymond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Association of Apartment Owners of Kulana v. Raymond, (hawapp 2021).

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 09-MAR-2021 09:42 AM Dkt. 24 OGMD NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF KULANA, a Hawaii condominium association, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CAMERON BENJAMIN RAYMOND; JOHN and JANE DOES 1-10; DOE PARTNERSHIPS; DOE CORPORATIONS; DOE GOVERNMENT AGENCIES and DOE ENTITIES 1-20, Defendants-Appellants

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT (CIVIL NO. 5CC171000034)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL (By: Hiraoka, Presiding Judge, Wadsworth and Nakasone, JJ.) Upon consideration of Plaintiff-Appellee Association of Apartment Owners of Kulana's (Association) December 1, 2020 Amended Motion to Dismiss (Motion), the papers in support, the record, and there being no opposition, it appears that: (1) On August 6, 2020, self-represented Defendant- Appellant Cameron Benjamin Raymond (Raymond) filed the notice of appeal; (2) On October 8, 2020, and October 9, 2020, the circuit court clerk filed the record on appeal and amended record on appeal, respectively; (3) On October 8, 2020, the appellate clerk notified the parties that the statement of jurisdiction and opening brief were due on or before October 19, 2020, and November 17, 2020, respectively; (4) Raymond did not file either document or request an extension of time; NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

(5) In the instant motion, the Association asks the court to dismiss the appeal because Raymond failed to file the statement of jurisdiction and opening brief; (6) On December 1, 2020, the appellate clerk notified Raymond that the time for filing the statement of jurisdiction and opening brief had expired, the matter would be called to the court's attention on December 11, 2020, for appropriate action, which could include dismissal of the appeal, under Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rules 12.1(e) and 30, and Raymond may request relief from default by motion; and (7) Raymond took no further action in this appeal. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, March 9, 2021.

/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Presiding Judge

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge

/s/ Karen T. Nakasone Associate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Association of Apartment Owners of Kulana v. Raymond, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/association-of-apartment-owners-of-kulana-v-raymond-hawapp-2021.