Associates Investment Co. v. Snyder

83 N.E.2d 622, 119 Ind. App. 20, 1949 Ind. App. LEXIS 128
CourtIndiana Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 1, 1949
DocketNo. 17,809.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 83 N.E.2d 622 (Associates Investment Co. v. Snyder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Associates Investment Co. v. Snyder, 83 N.E.2d 622, 119 Ind. App. 20, 1949 Ind. App. LEXIS 128 (Ind. Ct. App. 1949).

Opinion

Bowen, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for defendants on a promissory note. Appellees have not *21 filed a brief in support of the judgment of the trial court.

Our courts have adopted a rule that the failure of an appellee to file a brief controverting the errors complained of in cases where the appellant’s' brief makes a prima facie showing of reversible error, may be taken as a confession of such errors. In such cases the judgment may accordingly be reversed, and the cause remanded without prejudice to either party. This rule is not to be invoked for the benefit of the appellant but for the protection of the court, and whether it is invoked is discretionary with the court. Miller v. Julian (1904), 163 Ind. 582, 72 N. E. 588; Meadows v. Hickman (1947), 225 Ind. 146, 73 N. E. 2d 343; Huffman v. Huffman (1947), 117 Ind. App. 601, 75 N. E. 2d 172; Whallon v. Wood (1948), 118 Ind. App. 163, 77 N. E. 2d 913; Pittsburgh, etc., R. Co. v. Linder (1925), 195 Ind. 569, 145 N. E. 885; Bryant v. School Town of Oakland City (1930), 202 Ind. 254, 171 N. E. 378; Reed, Admr., v. Brown (1939), 215 Ind. 417, 19 N. E. 2d 1015.

The appellant herein in support of its appeal from the judgment has filed a brief which, in our opinion, makes a prima facie showing of reversible error.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded with instructions to sustain appellant’s motion for a new trial.

Wiltrout, J., not participating.

Note. — Reported in 83 N. E. 2d 622.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Newton D/B/a, Etc. v. Hunt D/B/a, Etc.
142 N.E.2d 643 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1957)
Lunsford v. Maida
140 N.E.2d 762 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1957)
Moore v. Hill
102 N.E.2d 208 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1951)
City of Connersville v. Adams
98 N.E.2d 230 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 N.E.2d 622, 119 Ind. App. 20, 1949 Ind. App. LEXIS 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/associates-investment-co-v-snyder-indctapp-1949.