Associates Financial Services Co. of Oklahoma, Inc. v. Crawford County Memorial Hospital, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Associates Financial Services Co. of Oklahoma, Inc. v. Crawford County Memorial Hospital, Inc.

759 S.W.2d 210, 297 Ark. 14, 1988 Ark. LEXIS 483

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedOctober 31, 1988

Docket88-164

StatusPublished

Cited by16 cases

This text of 759 S.W.2d 210 (Associates Financial Services Co. of Oklahoma, Inc. v. Crawford County Memorial Hospital, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Associates Financial Services Co. of Oklahoma, Inc. v. Crawford County Memorial Hospital, Inc., 759 S.W.2d 210, 297 Ark. 14, 1988 Ark. LEXIS 483 (Ark. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

Steele Hays, Justice.

This is an appeal from the denial of a motion for default judgment, which we dismiss for want of an appealable order.

Associates Financial Services Company, appellant, filed a writ of garnishment against County Memorial Hospital, a corporate garnishee. The hospital sent a letter to the circuit clerk, with a copy to Associates’ attorney, setting forth certain facts about the employment and wages of the defendant. The letter was signed by the personnel director of the hospital and was the hospital’s only response to the writ of garnishment.

Associates objected to the letter, primarily because it was not filed by an attorney. It argued that the letter was not a properly filed answer because a corporation cannot practice law except through licensed attorneys, citing All City Glass and Mirror v. McGrow Hill Information Systems Co., 295 Ark. 520, 750 S.W.2d 395 (1988). Associates asked that the letter be struck and that the circuit court grant a default judgment in the amount alleged in the writ of garnishment. The circuit judge held that the hospital had substantially complied and so denied the motion for default judgment. From the denial of that order the appellant brings this appeal.

Even though the parties did not raise the issue of the appealability of this order, it is our duty to determine whether or not we have jurisdiction. Kilgore v. Viner, 293 Ark. 187, 736 S.W.2d 1 (1987); Hyatt v. City of Bentonville, 275 Ark. 210, 628 S.W.2d 326 (1982). For an order of a trial court to be appealable, it must be an order which in effect determines the action and prevents a judgment from which an appeal might be taken or discontinues the action. ARAP Rule 2(a)(2). The denial of a motion for a default judgment is not a final order. DeClerk v. Tribble, 269 Ark. 572, 599 S.W.2d 152 (1980).

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Steele Hays, Justice.

This is an appeal from the denial of a motion for default judgment, which we dismiss for want of an appealable order.

Associates Financial Services Company, appellant, filed a writ of garnishment against County Memorial Hospital, a corporate garnishee. The hospital sent a letter to the circuit clerk, with a copy to Associates’ attorney, setting forth certain facts about the employment and wages of the defendant. The letter was signed by the personnel director of the hospital and was the hospital’s only response to the writ of garnishment.

Associates objected to the letter, primarily because it was not filed by an attorney. It argued that the letter was not a properly filed answer because a corporation cannot practice law except through licensed attorneys, citing All City Glass and Mirror v. McGrow Hill Information Systems Co., 295 Ark. 520, 750 S.W.2d 395 (1988). Associates asked that the letter be struck and that the circuit court grant a default judgment in the amount alleged in the writ of garnishment. The circuit judge held that the hospital had substantially complied and so denied the motion for default judgment. From the denial of that order the appellant brings this appeal.

Even though the parties did not raise the issue of the appealability of this order, it is our duty to determine whether or not we have jurisdiction. Kilgore v. Viner, 293 Ark. 187, 736 S.W.2d 1 (1987); Hyatt v. City of Bentonville, 275 Ark. 210, 628 S.W.2d 326 (1982). For an order of a trial court to be appealable, it must be an order which in effect determines the action and prevents a judgment from which an appeal might be taken or discontinues the action. ARAP Rule 2(a)(2). The denial of a motion for a default judgment is not a final order. DeClerk v. Tribble, 269 Ark. 572, 599 S.W.2d 152 (1980).

The appeal is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

759 S.W.2d 210, 297 Ark. 14, 1988 Ark. LEXIS 483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/associates-financial-services-co-of-oklahoma-inc-v-crawford-county-ark-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack