Associated Television & Communications, Inc. v. Cowden

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Associated Television & Communications, Inc. v. Cowden

417 So. 2d 1027, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20487

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 7, 1982

DocketNo. 81-359

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 417 So. 2d 1027 (Associated Television & Communications, Inc. v. Cowden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Associated Television & Communications, Inc. v. Cowden, 417 So. 2d 1027, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20487 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The final judgment appealed from is affirmed. Appellant has not demonstrated an abuse of discretion by the trial court in refusing to allow the appellant, defendant below, to amend a pre-trial agreement one week before trial, under the circumstances of this case. The party moving to amend a pre-trial order has the burden of showing that such modification is proper. Alvarez v. Mauney, 175 So.2d 57 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965). That burden was not met here. Consequently, there is also no error demonstrated in the denial of appellant’s motion for continuance.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, C. J., and DAUKSCH and SHARP, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The final judgment appealed from is affirmed. Appellant has not demonstrated an abuse of discretion by the trial court in refusing to allow the appellant, defendant below, to amend a pre-trial agreement one week before trial, under the circumstances of this case. The party moving to amend a pre-trial order has the burden of showing that such modification is proper. Alvarez v. Mauney, 175 So.2d 57 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965). That burden was not met here. Consequently, there is also no error demonstrated in the denial of appellant’s motion for continuance.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, C. J., and DAUKSCH and SHARP, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

417 So. 2d 1027, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/associated-television-communications-inc-v-cowden-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack