Associated Schools, Inc. v. Dade County

209 So. 2d 489
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 23, 1968
Docket67-477
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 209 So. 2d 489 (Associated Schools, Inc. v. Dade County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Associated Schools, Inc. v. Dade County, 209 So. 2d 489 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

209 So.2d 489 (1968)

ASSOCIATED SCHOOLS, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellant,
v.
DADE COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, and Woodmen of the World Life Insurance Society, Appellees.

No. 67-477.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

April 23, 1968.
Rehearing Denied May 14, 1968.

Kelly, Black & Black, Miami, for appellant.

Thomas C. Britton, County Atty., Joseph Nesbitt, Tallahassee, George E. Owen, Omaha, Neb., for appellees.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C.J., and BARKDULL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Involved in this appeal is whether or not the holder of a note secured by a mortgage, which note and mortgage provided a penalty for prepayment is entitled to the prepayment penalty when the property encumbered by the mortgage is taken by eminent domain proceedings. The trial court held that the mortgagee was entitled to his prepayment penalty from the funds on deposit in the registry of the court, pursuant to an order of taking under § 74.051, Fla. Stat., F.S.A. We reverse.

The Supreme Court of Florida, in Shavers v. Duval County, Fla. 1954, 73 So.2d 684, held that where there was no right to prepayment a mortgagee was not entitled to receive an amount from the proceeds of a condemnation proceedings which would equal the interest for the term remaining on a note and mortgage after taking and distribution, holding that a mortgagee was only entitled to the return of its principal and accrued interest. If this be true as to unearned interest, it certainly should be *490 true as to prepayment penalties. Therefore, we hold that all the mortgagee was entitled to in this situation was the return of its principal and interest accrued until the date of distribution.

The order under review is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eastern Savings Bank, FSB v. Munson
932 A.2d 1079 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2007)
In Re AJ Lane & Co., Inc.
113 B.R. 821 (D. Massachusetts, 1990)
Village of Rosemont v. Maywood-Proviso State Bank
501 N.E.2d 859 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1986)
Berenato v. Bell Savings & Loan Ass'n
419 A.2d 620 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
209 So. 2d 489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/associated-schools-inc-v-dade-county-fladistctapp-1968.