Associated Metals & Minerals Corp. v. United States
This text of 43 Cust. Ct. 307 (Associated Metals & Minerals Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
It was stipulated that the issues and facts herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C.C.P.A. 112, C.A.D. 351) and that one bag, reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, was not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty is not assessable upon the one bag of merchandise, which was reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
43 Cust. Ct. 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/associated-metals-minerals-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1959.