Associated Metals & Minerals Corp. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Associated Metals & Minerals Corp. v. United States

28 Cust. Ct. 345, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 761

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedDecember 18, 1951

DocketNo. 56174; protest 170516-K (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 28 Cust. Ct. 345 (Associated Metals & Minerals Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Associated Metals & Minerals Corp. v. United States, 28 Cust. Ct. 345, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 761 (cusc 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

When the case was called for trial, the only evidence offered was an amended report of the United States Customs Laboratory, which was received in evidence as exhibit 1. It was conceded by counsel for the Government that the original laboratory report stating that the merchandise consisted of “needle antimony,” and which was the basis of the collector’s action, is erroneous. Upon the record presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

When the case was called for trial, the only evidence offered was an amended report of the United States Customs Laboratory, which was received in evidence as exhibit 1. It was conceded by counsel for the Government that the original laboratory report stating that the merchandise consisted of “needle antimony,” and which was the basis of the collector’s action, is erroneous. Upon the record presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 Cust. Ct. 345, 1951 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/associated-metals-minerals-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1951.