Associated Industries Insurance Company, Inc. v. Mt. Hawley Insurance Company; James River Insurance Company; Kinsale Insurance Company; and Does 1 – 10, inclusive.

District Court, C.D. California·Decided February 5, 2026·No. 5:25-cv-02405·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 ASSOCIATED INDUSTRIES CASE NO: 5:25-cv-02405 MCS (AGRx) INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. 11 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED Plaintiff, PROTECTIVE ORDER 12 v. 13 MT. HAWLEY INSURANCE 14 COMPANY; JAMES RIVER Assigned to Dept: 7C INSURANCE COMPANY; Judge: Hon. Mark C. Scarsi COMPANY; AND DOES 1 – 10, 16 inclusive. 17 Defendants. 18 19 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 20 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 21 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure 22 and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. 23 Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following 24 Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer 25 blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection 26 it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items 27 that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated 1 Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Civil 2 Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that 3 will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 5 This action involves whether and to what extent any defendant also has a duty to 6 defend or indemnify Plaintiff’s named insured, Orr Builders, Inc. (“Orr”), in an ongoing 7 underlying Breach of Contract/Construction Defect arbitration (“Underlying Action”) 8 either as a named insured or as an additional insured on liability policies issued to 9 subcontractors. As a result, discovery will likely include status reports, liability 10 analyses, and unredacted defense billing, which contain privileged attorney-client 11 communications and/or attorney work product as to third-parties. Further, Plaintiff 12 represents that the construction defect portion of the Underlying Action is close to 13 resolving but Orr and the underlying property owner must still resolve certain breach of 14 contract and failure to pay claims. Therefore, Plaintiff believes this action necessarily 15 involves and includes confidential communications about the ongoing defense of Orr in 16 the Underlying Action among and between the underlying plaintiff, Orr, Orr’s 17 subcontractors, Orr and the subcontractors’ defense counsel, insurance defense counsel, 18 and insurance coverage counsel for the parties involving, but not limited to, analysis 19 and discussion of the claims against Orr in the Underlying Action regarding merits of 20 the claims, defenses, damages, potential liability of Orr and its subcontractors, and 21 grounds for coverage under insurance policies issued to Orr and under policies in which 22 Orr qualifies as an additional insured that are privileged or protected as to other parties. 23 (See, Lectrolarm Custom Sys. v. Pelco Sales, Inc., 212 F.R.D. 567, 572 (E.D. Cal. 24 2002)). It would be highly and unduly prejudicial to Orr if, for example, the cross- 25 complaint property owner in the Underlying Action was able to discover and obtain 26 these confidential and privileged communications. 27 Additionally, the action may also involve proprietary information in regard to claims handling, and/or adjusting of claims for which special protection from public 1 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action is 2 warranted. Such confidential and proprietary materials and information may consist of, 3 among other things, confidential or proprietary business or financial information, 4 confidential information regarding business practices, market research, business 5 development, or commercial information (including information implicating privacy 6 rights of third parties), information otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or 7 which may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under insurance 8 regulations, state or federal statutes, court rules, case decisions, or common law. 9 Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of 10 disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect information 11 the parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted 12 reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, 13 to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a 14 protective order for such information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the 15 parties that information will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and 16 that nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in 17 a confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of 18 the public record of this case. 19 2. DEFINITIONS 20 2.1 Action: this pending federal lawsuit. 21 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of 22 information or items under this Order. 23 2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how 24 it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under 25 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the Good Cause 26 Statement. 27 2.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their 1 support staff). 2 2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or 3 items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as 4 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 5 2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of 6 the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among 7 other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated 8 in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 9 2.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 10 pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an 11 expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 12 2.8 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action. 13 House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside 14 counsel. 15 2.9 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or 16 other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 17 2.10 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to 18 this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and have 19 appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which 20 has appeared on behalf of that party, and includes support staff. 21 2.11 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, 22 employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their 23 support staffs). 24 2.12 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or 25 Discovery Material in this Action. 26 2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support 27 services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and 1 their employees and subcontractors. 2 2.14 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is 3 designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 4 2.15 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material 5 from a Producing Party. 6 3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Associated Industries Insurance Company, Inc. v. Mt. Hawley Insurance Company; James River Insurance Company; Kinsale Insurance Company; and Does 1 – 10, inclusive., (C.D. Cal. 2026).

Associated Industries Insurance Company, Inc. v. Mt. Hawley Insurance Company; James River Insurance Company; Kinsale Insurance Company; and Does 1 – 10, inclusive. (Associated Industries Insurance Company, Inc. v. Mt. Hawley Insurance Company; James River Insurance Company; Kinsale Insurance Company; and Does 1 – 10, inclusive.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lectrolarm Custom Systems, Inc. v. Pelco Sales, Inc.
212 F.R.D. 567 (E.D. California, 2002)