Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Industrial Accident Commission

115 Cal. App. 769
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Industrial Accident Commission. Read the opinion of the Court — 124 Cal. App. 378
California Court of Appeal·Decided August 3, 1931·No. Civ. No. 7488·Published

Opinion

NOURSE, P. J.

This is an original proceeding in certiorari to review an award of 'respondent in favor of Earl Joy and adverse to the respective insurance carriers of the “San Francisco Examiner” and the “San Francisco Chronicle.” The petitioner herein, as the insurance carrier of the “Chronicle,” attacks that portion of the award adverse to it.

In so far as this petition is concerned the facts are the same as those in Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Industrial Acc. Com. (Civil No. 7473), ante, p. 754 [2 Pac. (2d) 51].

For the reasons therein given the portion of the award relating to the petitioner is annulled.

Sturtevant, J., and Spence, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Industrial Accident Commission, 115 Cal. App. 769 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931).

115 Cal. App. 769 (Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Industrial Accident Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Industrial Accident Commission
2 P.2d 51 (California Court of Appeal, 1931)