Associated Food Retailers of Greater Chicago, Inc. v. Jewel Tea Co.

Supreme Court

Associated Food Retailers of Greater Chicago, Inc. v. Jewel Tea Co.

381 U.S. 761, 85 S. Ct. 1797, 14 L. Ed. 2d 713, 1965 U.S. LEXIS 978

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJune 7, 1965

Docket321

StatusPublished

This text of 381 U.S. 761 (Associated Food Retailers of Greater Chicago, Inc. v. Jewel Tea Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Associated Food Retailers of Greater Chicago, Inc. v. Jewel Tea Co., 381 U.S. 761, 85 S. Ct. 1797, 14 L. Ed. 2d 713, 1965 U.S. LEXIS 978 (1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment below is reversed. Meat Cutters v. Jewel Tea, ante, p. 676.

Mr. Justice Harlan, Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Goldberg concur in the judgment of the Court for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice Goldberg's opinion in United Mine Workers of America v. Pennington and Meat Cutters v. Jewel Teg, ante, at 697. Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Clark dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment below is reversed. Meat Cutters v. Jewel Tea, ante, p. 676.

Mr. Justice Harlan, Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Goldberg concur in the judgment of the Court for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice Goldberg's opinion in United Mine Workers of America v. Pennington and Meat Cutters v. Jewel Teg, ante, at 697. Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Clark dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

381 U.S. 761, 85 S. Ct. 1797, 14 L. Ed. 2d 713, 1965 U.S. LEXIS 978, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/associated-food-retailers-of-greater-chicago-inc-v-jewel-tea-co-scotus-1965.