Associated Dry Goods Corp. v. United States
This text of 57 Cust. Ct. 828 (Associated Dry Goods Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of earthenware similar in all material respects to that the subject of Justin Tharaud & Son, Inc., and J. J. Murphey & Co. v. United States (44 Cust. Ct. 216, C.D. 2177) and United States v. M. & D. Miller, Inc. (41 CCPA 226, C.A.D. 556), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
57 Cust. Ct. 828, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/associated-dry-goods-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1966.