Associated Dry Goods Corp. v. United States
57 Cust. Ct. 828, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1287
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of earthenware similar in all material respects to that the subject of Justin Tharaud & Son, Inc., and J. J. Murphey & Co. v. United States (44 Cust. Ct. 216, C.D. 2177) and United States v. M. & D. Miller, Inc. (41 CCPA 226, C.A.D. 556), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Associated Dry Goods Corp. v. United States, 57 Cust. Ct. 828, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1287 (cusc 1966).
57 Cust. Ct. 828 (Associated Dry Goods Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Justin Tharaud & Son, Inc. v. United States
44 Cust. Ct. 216 (U.S. Customs Court, 1960)