Associated Dry Goods Corp. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Associated Dry Goods Corp. v. United States

44 Cust. Ct. 458

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMay 9, 1960

DocketNo. 64151; protests 321946-K, etc. (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 44 Cust. Ct. 458 (Associated Dry Goods Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Associated Dry Goods Corp. v. United States, 44 Cust. Ct. 458 (cusc 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

[459]*459Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures the same in all material respects as those the subject of Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp. v. United States (39 C.C.P.A. 15, C.A.D. 458), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the setter “A” at 20 percent under paragraph 1547(a) ; and (2) the items marked with the letter “B” at 10 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the An-necy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 52476).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[459]*459Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures the same in all material respects as those the subject of Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp. v. United States (39 C.C.P.A. 15, C.A.D. 458), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the setter “A” at 20 percent under paragraph 1547(a) ; and (2) the items marked with the letter “B” at 10 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the An-necy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 52476).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

44 Cust. Ct. 458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/associated-dry-goods-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack