Associated Distributors, Inc. v. Willard

248 S.E.2d 645, 242 Ga. 247, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 1159
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 27, 1978
Docket33860
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 248 S.E.2d 645 (Associated Distributors, Inc. v. Willard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Associated Distributors, Inc. v. Willard, 248 S.E.2d 645, 242 Ga. 247, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 1159 (Ga. 1978).

Opinion

Nichols, Chief Justice.

Willard filed an equitable complaint to cancel certain liens filed by judgment creditors of T. M. Smith. Willard and Smith were the record title holders of the property on which the liens were filed. The trial court found that Smith had no equitable interest in the property and ordered the liens canceled. The order was entered on January 3, 1978, and filed with the clerk on January 5, 1978.

On April 11, 1978, appellants filed a petition for extension of time for filing an appeal, alleging that they were not notified of the court’s order until April 10,1978. After hearing, the trial court entered an order extending the time for filing a notice of appeal to May 10, 1978.

The appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, contending that under the facts of this case, the trial court was without authority to enter the order extending the time for filing the notice of appeal.

"The proper and timely filing of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction upon the appellate court.

*248 Submitted September 11, 1978 Decided September 27, 1978. Thomas E. Lawrence, Webb, Fowler & Tanner, Jones Webb, J. L. Edmondson, for appellants. Harvey, Willard, Elliott & Olsen, Billy Olsen, for appellees.

"We hold that the burden is on the party desiring to take the appeal to determine when the judgment is filed in the trial court, and the burden is on the party desiring to appeal to file his notice of appeal within the 30-day period or within a duly authorized extension of the 30-day period.

"This court does not have jurisdiction to review the judgment sought to be appealed because of the failure to confer jurisdiction upon this court pursuant to the Appellate Practice Act. Therefore the judgment below stands as rendered by the trial court.” Jordan v. Caldwell, 229 Ga. 343, 344 (191 SE2d 530) (1972). See also Rogers v. Rogers, 238 Ga. 576 (234 SE2d 495) (1977).

Code Ann. § 6-804 explicitly requires that any application for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal "must be made before expiration of the period for filing as originally prescribed” and that "only one extension of time shall be granted for filing of notice of appeal.” Those requirements are jurisdictional. Jordan v. Caldwell, supra.

Appeal dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Hill, J., who concurs in the judgment only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pinkney v. Union
405 S.E.2d 521 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1991)
Willis v. State
366 S.E.2d 778 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1988)
Woodall v. Woodall
281 S.E.2d 619 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1981)
Hardin v. Macon Mall
282 S.E.2d 753 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)
Cambron v. Canal Insurance
269 S.E.2d 426 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1980)
Birt v. Hopper
265 S.E.2d 276 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1980)
Sheehan v. Sheehan
260 S.E.2d 77 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 S.E.2d 645, 242 Ga. 247, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 1159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/associated-distributors-inc-v-willard-ga-1978.