Associated Contract Loggers, Inc. v. United States Forest Service

Eighth Circuit

Associated Contract Loggers, Inc. v. United States Forest Service

10 F. App'x 397

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedJune 5, 2001

DocketNo. 00-1730

StatusPublished

This text of 10 F. App'x 397 (Associated Contract Loggers, Inc. v. United States Forest Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Associated Contract Loggers, Inc. v. United States Forest Service, 10 F. App'x 397 (8th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs, Associated Contract Loggers, Inc. and Olson Logging Inc., filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota¹ against the United States Forest Service and two not-for-profit groups, Forest Guardians and Superior Wilderness Action Network. Plaintiffs allege a violation of the Establishment Clause. The district court dismissed the suit on defendants’ motions pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). The plaintiffs now appeal. Amici curiae Koochiching County [398]*398and The Northern Counties Land Use Coordinating Board have submitted a joint brief in support of plaintiffs’ position.²

Finding that no error of law appears in the district court’s opinion, and that further opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm without discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs, Associated Contract Loggers, Inc. and Olson Logging Inc., filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota¹ against the United States Forest Service and two not-for-profit groups, Forest Guardians and Superior Wilderness Action Network. Plaintiffs allege a violation of the Establishment Clause. The district court dismissed the suit on defendants’ motions pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). The plaintiffs now appeal. Amici curiae Koochiching County [398]*398and The Northern Counties Land Use Coordinating Board have submitted a joint brief in support of plaintiffs’ position.²

Finding that no error of law appears in the district court’s opinion, and that further opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm without discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 F. App'x 397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/associated-contract-loggers-inc-v-united-states-forest-service-ca8-2001.