Assoc. for Accessible Medicines v. Becerra

E.D. California

Assoc. for Accessible Medicines v. Becerra

District Court, E.D. California·Decided October 1, 2020·No. 2:20-cv-01708·Unknown

Opinion

1 2

7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ASSOCIATION FOR ACCESSIBLE CASE NO. 2:20-CV-01708-TLN-DB 11 MEDICINES, SEALING ORDER 12 Plaintiff,

13 v.

14 XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California, 15 Defendant. 16

17 18 Pursuant to Local Rule 141 and based upon the representations contained in Plaintiff’s Request 19 to Seal, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Exhibits B, C, D, E, and F to Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary 20 Injunction shall be SEALED until further order of this Court. See, e.g., Four in One Co. v. S.K. Foods, 21 L.P., No. 2:08-CV-03017-KJM-EFB, 2014 WL 4078232, at *2 n.1 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 14, 2014) 22 (“Considering these factors, the court finds the need to protect the parties’ settlement negotiations 23 outweighs any necessity for disclosure.”). It is further ordered that electronic access to the sealed 24 documents shall be limited to counsel for the parties. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 DATED: September 30, 2020

27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2

7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ASSOCIATION FOR ACCESSIBLE CASE NO. 2:20-CV-01708-TLN-DB 11 MEDICINES, SEALING ORDER 12 Plaintiff,

13 v.

14 XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California, 15 Defendant. 16

17 18 Pursuant to Local Rule 141 and based upon the representations contained in Plaintiff’s Request 19 to Seal, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Exhibits B, C, D, E, and F to Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary 20 Injunction shall be SEALED until further order of this Court. See, e.g., Four in One Co. v. S.K. Foods, 21 L.P., No. 2:08-CV-03017-KJM-EFB, 2014 WL 4078232, at *2 n.1 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 14, 2014) 22 (“Considering these factors, the court finds the need to protect the parties’ settlement negotiations 23 outweighs any necessity for disclosure.”). It is further ordered that electronic access to the sealed 24 documents shall be limited to counsel for the parties. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 DATED: September 30, 2020

27 28

Assoc. for Accessible Medicines v. Becerra, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

Pincite

Assoc. for Accessible Medicines v. Becerra (Assoc. for Accessible Medicines v. Becerra) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.