Assmann v. Rose
This text of 264 A.D. 988 (Assmann v. Rose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed on
the facts and a new trial granted, -with costs to the appellants to abide the event, on the ground that the findings that defendants were negligent and that plaintiff was free from contributory negligence are against the weight of evidence. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
264 A.D. 988, 37 N.Y.S.2d 651, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/assmann-v-rose-nyappdiv-1942.