Assmann v. Rose

264 A.D. 988, 37 N.Y.S.2d 651, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5644

This text of 264 A.D. 988 (Assmann v. Rose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Assmann v. Rose, 264 A.D. 988, 37 N.Y.S.2d 651, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5644 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed on

the facts and a new trial granted, -with costs to the appellants to abide the event, on the ground that the findings that defendants were negligent and that plaintiff was free from contributory negligence are against the weight of evidence. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
264 A.D. 988, 37 N.Y.S.2d 651, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/assmann-v-rose-nyappdiv-1942.