Assance v. Lincoln County
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION TRISTAN ASSANCE, 9:24-cv-00009-DWM Plaintiff, V. ORDER LINCOLN COUNTY, BRANDON HOLZER, JAMES KIRK KRAFT, and DOES 1-10, Defendants.
Defendant Brandon Holzer has moved unopposed to stay these proceeding. pending the outcome of his interlocutory appeal of this Court’s Order denying qualified immunity on the pleadings, (see Doc. 35). (Doc. 42.) The Court does not believe an appeal is appropriate at this early stage of the case. However, recognizing the parties’ stipulation and the law on this issue, see Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 530 (1985), IT IS ORDERED that the motion (Doc. 42) is GRANTED. This matter is STAYED pending the outcome of Holzer’s appeal. The deadlines and March 3,
2025 jury trial set in the April 30, 2024 Scheduling Order (Doc. 18) are VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Holzer must inform this Court within fourteen (14) days of either the dismissal of or the issuance of a mandate in his appeal.
DATED this } O day of December, 2024.
Dena . Molloy, District Judge UnitedStates District Court
Zz
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Assance v. Lincoln County (Assance v. Lincoln County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.