Assad v. New York-Presbyt. Hosp.

2024 NY Slip Op 32564(U)
New York Supreme Court, New York County·Decided July 24, 2024·No. Index No. 106127/2006·Unpublished

Opinion

Assad v New York-Presbyt. Hosp.

2024 NY Slip Op 32564(U)

July 24, 2024

Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 106127/2006 Judge: John J. Kelley

Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication.

NYSCEF DOC. NO. 64 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/25/2024

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY

PRESENT: HON. JOHN J. KELLEY PART 56M Justice

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X INDEX NO. 106127/2006 RAGAA ASSAD, AS ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM OF BISHOY ASSAD, DECEASED, MOTION DATE 05/09/2024

Plaintiff, MOTION SEQ. NO. 009

-v-

NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL, formerly known as COLUMBIA PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CENTER, DECISION + ORDER ON COLUMBIA PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL GROUP, GWEN MOTION NICHOLS, M.D., and SANDRA RUSSO, M.D.,

Defendants.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 009) 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63 were read on this motion to/for AMEND/MODIFY DECISION/ORDER/JUDGMENT .

In this action to recover damages for medical malpractice and negligence, the attorneys for the deceased plaintiff, Ragaa Assad, as administrator ad prosequendum of Bishoy Assad, deceased, move pursuant to CPLR 1015 and 1021 to vacate the automatic stay of proceedings imposed by operation of law upon Ragaa Assad’s death, and substitute Ragaa Assad’s son, Albert Assad, both as a successor administrator of the estate of Bishoy Assad, and as party plaintiff in place and instead of Ragaa Assad. They also move pursuant to CPLR 305(c) for leave to amend the caption accordingly. In addition, the deceased plaintiff’s attorneys move pursuant to EPTL 5-4.6(A)(1) and CPLR 2221(a) to modify this court’s July 21, 2022 decedent’s compromise order to award them additional disbursements, and to direct the settling defendant’s insurance carrier to disburse settlement drafts as requested. Albert Assad opposes the motion. The motion is granted to the extent that the stay is vacated, Albert Assad, as “substituted administrator” of the estate of Bishoy Assad, is substituted as a party plaintiff in place and instead of Ragaa Assad, as administrator ad prosequendum of Bishoy Assad,

106127/2006 ASSAD, RAGAA vs. PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL Page 1 of 7 Motion No. 009

1 of 7

[* 1]

NYSCEF DOC. NO. 64 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/25/2024

deceased, the caption is amended accordingly, and the deceased plaintiff’s attorneys are awarded an additional $15,839.40 as and for their disbursements, for a total of $19,530.06, while their fee is concomitantly reduced from $92,827.35 to $88,867.50. The motion is otherwise denied, and the insurance carrier for the settling defendant is directed to pay the proceeds of the settlement remaining after payment of attorneys’ fees and disbursements directly to the estate of Bishoy Assad.

In an order dated July 21, 2022, Ragaa Assad, as administrator ad prosequendum of Bishoy Assad, deceased, was authorized to settle and compromise her claims against the defendants New York-Presbyterian Hospital, formerly known as Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center (NYPD) for the total sum of $325,000.00, and thereupon discontinued her claims against NYPH, as well as the defendants Gwen Nichols, M.D., and Sandra Russo, M.D. That order awarded Silver & Kelmachter, LLP (S&K), as Ragaa Assad’s attorneys, the sums of $92,827.35 as and for their attorneys’ fees and $3,690.62 as and for the reimbursement of their costs and disbursements. The remaining proceeds were to be distributed in accordance with any further order of an appropriate Surrogate’s Court or Probate Court, although those proceeds were also directed to be deposited with the New York City Department of Finance. Ragaa Assad did not object to the payment of fees and disbursements and, in fact, submitted an affidavit in support of the compromise and settlement.

On April 12, 2023, Ragaa Assad died, and all proceedings in this action thus were automatically stayed by operation of law on that date, pending substitution of a substitute or successor representative of the estate of Bishoy Assad (see Perez v City of New York, 95 AD3d 675, 677 [1st Dept 2012]). On March 15, 2024, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Hudson County, Chancery Division, Probate Part, appointed Albert Assad---the son of Ragaa Assad and the brother of Bishoy Assad---as “substituted administrator of the estate of Bishoy Assad, deceased.” On April 18, 2024, S&K made the instant motion.

106127/2006 ASSAD, RAGAA vs. PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL Page 2 of 7 Motion No. 009

2 of 7

[* 2]

NYSCEF DOC. NO. 64 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/25/2024

Initially, it is well settled that, where an administrator or executor is appointed as representative of the estate of a decedent who was a party to a pending action, substitution and amendment of the caption is appropriate (see Tag 380, LLC v Estate of Howard P. Ronson, 69 AD3d 471, 473-474 [1st Dept 2010]). Thus, in order to seek substantive relief, the attorneys for a deceased representative of another decedent’s estate must first seek the substitution of a successor representative (see Bluestein v City of New York, 280 AD2d 506, 506 [2d Dept 2001]), relief that S&K requested as part of this motion. Inasmuch as Albert Assad has been appointed by a court of competent jurisdiction to serve as the substitute administrator of the estate of Bishoy Assad, it is appropriate to substitute Albert Assad as the party plaintiff herein. Although Albert Assad has asserted that he does not wish to be substituted as the plaintiff, he nonetheless also opposes S&K’s substantive request to modify this court’s decedent’s compromise order, asserting that S&K is not entitled to an award of additional disbursements, let alone the award of any disbursements at all. He cannot have it both ways. If he wishes to be heard in opposition to S&K’s request, he cannot do so an as nonparty.

With respect to S&K’s request for an award of additional disbursements, the court concludes that it established their entitlement thereto. Contrary to Albert Assad’s contention, the retainer agreement between Ragaa Assad and S&K clearly warrants the payment of disbursements to S&K from the settlement proceeds. Specifically, the retainer provided, at page one thereof, that,

“[t]he costs and expenses required in prosecuting the case may be either advanced by the client or by the Firm. The client may choose either option. If the client elects to advance the money for costs and expenses, the client must pay each cost and expense as it is incurred. If the client elects to have the Firm advance the money for costs and expenses, the money may be borrowed by the Firm from a third party lender and with a reasonable interest rate, statements are available upon request and plaintiff may pre-pay at any time. At the conclusion of the case, an such monies, including principal, interest and costs related to such advances shall be reimbursed to the law firm by the client.”

Ragaa Assad agreed upon a modification of the standard retainer agreement, and thus included

an addendum. On page two of the retainer agreement, where she was requested to elect either 106127/2006 ASSAD, RAGAA vs. PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL Page 3 of 7 Motion No. 009

3 of 7

[* 3]

NYSCEF DOC. NO. 64 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/25/2024

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Assad v. New York-Presbyt. Hosp., 2024 NY Slip Op 32564(U) (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2024).

2024 NY Slip Op 32564(U) (Assad v. New York-Presbyt. Hosp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

TAG 380, LLC v. Estate of Ronson
69 A.D.3d 471 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Perez v. City of New York
95 A.D.3d 675 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Bluestein v. City of New York
280 A.D.2d 506 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)